Last War • Season 5 Intelligence
Server 1338
Strength & Audit Report
Comparative audit of servers 1344, 1365, 1376, 1407, 1408, 1421 and 1429 using the 29 August 2026 MapScout snapshot.
Executive verdict
1338 is a top-tier server, but not the dominant server in this field. It ranks 3rd in both top-20 and top-100 captured hero power, and 2nd in top-200 depth. It can expect an advantage over five of seven comparison servers, a near-even contest with 1421, and a material disadvantage against 1365.
Top-100 rank
3 / 8
16.65B captured power
Top-200 rank
2 / 8
30.11B captured power
HQ35 rank
2 / 8
261 HQ35 records
Largest dependency
68%
of top 100 are UED
Threat order: 1365 → 1421 → 1407 (coordination risk) → 1376 → 1429 → 1344 → 1408.
Comparable strength benchmark
The most reliable comparison is the same ranked cohort on every server. Power is shown in billions (B); HQ counts come from the full map export.
| Rank | Server | Tier | Top 1 | Top 20 | Top 100 | vs 1338 | Top 200 | HQ30+ | HQ35 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1365 | A+ | 287.2M | 4.30B | 17.53B | +5.3% | 32.18B | 1,221 | 424 |
| 2 | 1421 | A | 468.1M | 4.21B | 16.73B | +0.5% | 29.54B | 936 | 210 |
| 3 | 1338 | A | 379.6M | 4.10B | 16.65B | — | 30.11B | 1,119 | 261 |
| 4 | 1376 | B+ | 320.7M | 3.91B | 16.19B | −2.8% | 28.57B | 888 | 225 |
| 5 | 1407 | B+ | 238.4M | 3.97B | 16.05B | −3.6% | 28.49B | 755 | 169 |
| 6 | 1429 | B+ | 250.9M | 3.94B | 15.93B | −4.3% | 28.88B | 691 | 164 |
| 7 | 1344 | B | 198.0M | 3.56B | 14.88B | −10.6% | 27.26B | 694 | 148 |
| 8 | 1408 | C | 176.4M | 3.09B | 13.83B | −17.0% | 25.34B | 670 | 72 |
Top-100 relative strength
What the rankings mean
- 1365 has both the strongest fighting cohort and the deepest HQ35 pool.
- 1421 is essentially level with 1338 at top 100, but its #1 account is 23% above 1338’s #1.
- 1338’s top-200 depth exceeds 1421 despite losing narrowly in the top 20/100.
- 1376, 1407 and 1429 are close enough that poor attendance or coordination could erase 1338’s statistical edge.
Audit of server 1338
Strengths
- Deep elite roster: 2nd in top-200 power, behind only 1365.
- Strong development base: 1,119 HQ30+ and 261 HQ35; both are second in the field.
- High-end anchor: 379.6M #1 player, second-highest individual power in the comparison.
- Cohesive spearhead: UED supplies 68 of the top 100, enabling concentrated command.
- Good snapshot discipline: only two top-100 players were exposed, tied for second-best posture.
Weaknesses / risks
- Not field leader: 1365 is ahead at top 20, top 100, top 200, HQ30+ and HQ35.
- Single-alliance dependency: UED’s 68% share is an efficiency advantage and a failure point if attendance, leadership or transfers weaken it.
- HQ35 conversion gap: 23.3% of 1338’s HQ30+ pool is HQ35 versus 34.7% on 1365.
- Predictable top composition: the top 20 are 45% Missile, 25% Tank/Air, 20% Aircraft and 10% Tank.
- Near-peer margins are thin: a 2.8–4.3% edge over 1376/1407/1429 is not large enough to absorb weak participation.
Opponent-by-opponent audit
| Server | Threat | Evidence | 1338 planning posture |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1365 | Very high | Top 100 +5.3%; top 200 +6.9%; 424 HQ35. Strength distributed across OWHF, S1TG, VnCT and LAS4. | Avoid isolated attrition. Use cross-alliance concentration and objective trading; assume it can sustain multiple fronts. |
| 1421 | Very high | Top 20 +2.6%; top 100 +0.5%; 468.1M #1. SXM holds 64 of top 100. | Do not build the plan around duelling its spearhead. 1338 has better top-200 and HQ depth; win through rotations and multi-point pressure. |
| 1407 | High coordination | Only 3.6% behind at top 100, while Romg holds 75 of its top 100—the highest concentration observed. | Treat Romg as a unified strike group. Pressure the less powerful support alliances and avoid reading the lower HQ count as low tactical danger. |
| 1376 | High | Top 100 −2.8%; 225 HQ35; TWGM holds 53 of top 100. Six top-100 bases exposed at snapshot. | Small statistical edge only. Require disciplined matchups and refresh exposure data immediately before action. |
| 1429 | Medium-high | Top 100 −4.3%; top 200 −4.1%; 164 HQ35. D3MN holds 51 of top 100. | Sustained pressure favours 1338’s deeper HQ pool. Avoid giving away the depth advantage in short, uncoordinated clashes. |
| 1344 | Medium | Top 100 −10.6%; top 20 −13.2%; 148 HQ35. Power is split between wyld and YtoK. | 1338 should be favoured. Aim for decisive objective control while containing unnecessary troop/resource loss. |
| 1408 | Lower | Top 100 −17.0%; top 20 −24.6%; 72 HQ35. Eight top-100 bases exposed at snapshot. | Best expansion matchup in the field. Still refresh the scan: the exposed count is volatile and not a permanent weakness. |
Alliance structure and operational resilience
| Server | Leading alliance | Players in top 100 | Share | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1338 | UED | 68 | 68% | Strong single-command spearhead; material dependency risk. |
| 1344 | wyld | 38 | 38% | More distributed; coordination may be harder but less fragile. |
| 1365 | OWHF | 32 | 32% | Most distributed elite strength; capable of credible multi-alliance operations. |
| 1376 | TWGM | 53 | 53% | Moderately concentrated spearhead. |
| 1407 | Romg | 75 | 75% | Highest concentration; tactical coordination threat and single-point dependency. |
| 1408 | FPNX | 35 | 35% | Distributed, but overall cohort is materially weaker. |
| 1421 | SXM | 64 | 64% | Powerful concentrated spearhead built around the field’s strongest account. |
| 1429 | D3MN | 51 | 51% | Balanced between a lead alliance and meaningful support. |
Season 5 action plan for 1338
- Create a two-wave command model. Use UED as the spearhead, but pre-assign POTH, TitN and DoSt to a documented second-wave/holding role so success is not dependent on the same 68 players.
- Prioritise HQ35 conversion. 1338 has a large HQ30+ pipeline, but its HQ35 conversion trails 1365 materially. Promote the players closest to HQ35 and protect the resources needed to finish them.
- Build three opponent rosters. Maintain separate target/matchup sheets for 1365, 1421 and the 1407 Romg block; these require different responses despite similar headline power.
- Reduce composition predictability. The top-20 Missile concentration is visible. Pre-plan alternative marches and matchup assignments rather than presenting one standard spearhead.
- Exploit depth, not only whales. Against 1421, 1376 and 1429, use rotations and sustained objective pressure; 1338’s relative advantage grows below the very top accounts.
- Refresh intelligence before each war window. Re-export the same eight fields, compare transfers and power movement, then update exposed targets. Shield state should be treated as live intelligence, not a static rating.
Audit limitations
Do not interpret “captured total power” as full server power. Only 190–199 records per server contain non-zero Total Hero Power, while thousands of other map records show zero. This is consistent with an export/enrichment cap. Rankings use like-for-like top cohorts. Map count is not an active-player count, squad details are concentrated in roughly the top 100, and shield state is only a moment-in-time observation.
Duplicate coordinates were not found. A small number of duplicate names appear on servers 1365, 1407, 1408 and 1421; names are not used as unique identifiers in the ranking logic. Tier labels are analytical, not in-game classifications.